RAND Study Finds US Cannot Repair Battle-Damaged Ships in War with China
A
Force regeneration, not firepower, is the binding constraint in a sustained Indo-Pacific conflict, per RAND's single published study (RRA470-9); secondary coverage adds nothing original. Peacetime C2 structures are embedded in wartime planning at precisely the moment they become least suited to demand, while China's proximity and industrial depth eliminate that constraint on its side. Allied support is politically contingent: Japan, South Korea, and Australia each face domestic political exposure hosting US repairs under Chinese escalation pressure. The study modeled one ship class under peacetime baselines, and US industrial surge capacity in a declared war could close gaps the framework does not capture. Pre-negotiated port access, forward parts stockpiles, and command authority reform must precede the first exchange.
4 sources
- Battle Damage Repair for Arleigh Burke-Class Destroyers: Tabletop Exercise Results -
RAND Corporation - US could not repair battle-damaged ships in war with China study finds -
Military Times - US couldn't repair battle-damaged ships in war with China, study finds -
Defense News - The Pacific Pivot's Achilles' Heel: US Won't Be Able to Repair Battle-Damaged Warships In Conflict with China, Study Finds -
Sunday Guardian Live