Diplomatic — 2026-07-08

Trump Claims Zelensky and Putin Both Want to Make a Deal After Speaking to Both Leaders

BLUFAbsent any documented shift on territory or security guarantees, a US-brokered ceasefire or framework agreement remains unlikely by August 7, with Trump's own remarks confirming no substantive movement from either side.

Speaking in Ankara at the NATO summit, President Trump said Russian President Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky "both want to make a deal," citing a call with Putin on Sunday and a subsequent conversation with Zelensky 12. Trump said "nothing has changed" in his underlying assessment despite the optimism, and when asked if Putin had shown new willingness to make concessions, replied "never changed" 1. He said the war does not directly affect the United States but "affects Europe much more," and described battlefield violence as "carnage" that "should stop" 13. Separately at the summit, Zelensky called for Europe to prioritize production of anti-ballistic missile systems against Russian strikes and renewed his appeal for Ukraine's NATO membership 2. Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet on Wednesday 2.

Analysis
Trump's optimistic framing of separate Putin and Zelensky calls describes atmosphere, not any documented shift on territory, sanctions, or security guarantees, and his own admission that his assessment "never changed" undercuts the diplomacy he projected publicly, making a negotiated ceasefire or framework agreement by August 7 unlikely. Confidence is moderate: reporting on Trump's remarks converges across four outlets, but none independently confirms concessions from Moscow or Kyiv. Zelensky's parallel push for NATO membership and expanded missile-defense production suggests Kyiv is preparing for prolonged conflict rather than imminent settlement, at odds with Trump's framing. The optimistic rhetoric may instead function as leverage to keep both leaders engaged rather than reflect narrowing positions. European allies weighing faster missile-defense and NATO-track commitments for Kyiv should treat this as rhetorical momentum, not an actual negotiating framework.

4 sources