IRGC public attack on FM Araghchi over Hormuz framing signals breakdown in negotiating-team unity ahead of Islamabad round
Jerusalem Post tracks an overt IRGC-linked media attack on Foreign Minister
Tasnim's on-the-record attack, corroborated across converging outlets, reads as a deliberate IRGC positional stake ahead of Islamabad, not organic friction; converting private objections to negotiating-team composition into a public rebuke changes how any Araghchi commitment should be scored. His maritime-passage framing carries no binding force on the IRGC Navy absent an explicit Khamenei endorsement, and that endorsement's absence is the indicator the hardline faction has prevailed. The back channel has a roughly even chance of collapsing within the coming ten days; what sustains it is Tehran's economic need, not negotiating cohesion, and any agreement Araghchi signs in Pakistan this month is very likely renegotiable domestically within 30 days unless IRGC naval command is explicitly folded into Hormuz transit terms. The rhetoric may be choreographed, a good-cop bad-cop play Tehran has run before, using staged internal disunity to extract sanctions-relief concessions as the price of reining in the Navy, but the operational follow-through of firing on two Indian-flagged tankers the next day weights against theater.