IC Oversight & Policy — 2026-07-15

Rubio Turned On Disappearing Signal Messages Despite Court Declaration He Does Not Use Auto-Delete

BLUFRubio's post-declaration activation of auto-delete and the department's silent retreat from its sworn denial create compounding spoliation risk that Democracy Forward can now exploit with specificity.

A State Department adviser told a federal court on September 9 that Secretary of State Marco Rubio "does not use the auto-deletion functions in third party messaging applications when sending communications that may include federal records," in a declaration filed by Susan Weetman amid Freedom of Information Act litigation over Rubio's Signal records 1. About two months later, Rubio changed the settings on a Signal chat with other senior officials so messages would auto-delete after a set period, according to a person familiar with the exchange cited by The Atlantic 1. A State Department official contested that Rubio has made a practice of enabling disappearing messages but did not address the specific instance, and in an April 30 court filing tied to a separate settlement, the department did not repeat its earlier claim that Rubio does not use auto-deletion 1. Raw Story, citing The Atlantic's reporting, characterized the shift as Rubio's lawyers retreating from their original court representation 2. Litigation records also showed a three-person Signal chat among Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine set to auto-delete after eight hours, and that Rubio's government phone had been equipped in July 2025 with LeapXpert software intended to preserve Signal messages regardless of auto-delete settings 1.

Analysis
Weetman's sworn September declaration that Rubio avoids auto-deletion sits uneasily against his subsequent activation of disappearing messages on a Signal chat with senior officials, reopening spoliation exposure in the Democracy Forward FOIA litigation regardless of whether LeapXpert captured the deleted content. The department's April 30 filing quietly dropped the "does not use" language rather than correcting it, inviting judicial scrutiny of whether the original declaration was accurate when made, and the redacted eight-hour auto-delete chat among Rubio, Hegseth, and Caine gives litigants a concrete comparison point beyond Rubio's own account. The Atlantic is the sole primary source, with Raw Story amplifying rather than independently confirming, leaving the episode single-sourced. The shift may instead reflect routine security hygiene rather than evasion, consistent with eliminating records already archived elsewhere, and the case tests whether server-side capture tools satisfy preservation duties assigned to the eMessaging platform rather than Signal itself.
2 sources
  1. Marco Rubio's Disappearing Signal Chat - The Atlantic
  2. Rubio's lawyers retreat in court after denying his Signal war chats set to auto-delete - Raw Story

View in full brief →

UNCLASSIFIED // OPEN SOURCE