Allied Intelligence — 2026-05-26

Former Turkish MP Alleges MIT Intelligence Service Compiled Veto Lists to Purge Opposition CHP Lawmakers

BLUFAbsent any documentary backing or corroboration, Aygün's account functions more as protest-timed narrative shaping than verifiable disclosure, yet it signals deepening opposition readiness to attribute CHP's collapse to intelligence engineering rather than internal failure.

Aygün's May 25 post came four days after a Turkish court ruling annulled CHP's incumbent Özgür Özel-led leadership and reinstated Kılıçdaroğlu, framing the historical MIT-control allegations as a direct warning about the political figure being judicially restored to power amid ongoing party crisis 12. Aygün alleged Kılıçdaroğlu warned Hatay MP Refik Eryılmaz "MIT is watching you, watch your steps" after MIT grew uncomfortable with Eryılmaz's Syria-focused parliamentary work, and that Kılıçdaroğlu associates circulated a MIT-compiled list ahead of the 2015 elections naming MPs to be excluded from the party slate, with both Aygün and Eryılmaz reportedly near the top 1234. Aygün also recounted that then-CHP figure Veli Ağbaba privately told him the 2018 candidate reshuffling constituted "the liquidation of CHP's left wing," which Aygün linked to demands from unnamed "deep forces" backing the "Table of Six" opposition coalition 13. No formal CHP response to Aygün's specific historical allegations has been reported 1.

Analysis
Aygün's allegations, drawn from a single Cumhuriyet translation of his X post with no independent corroboration, reframe the CHP's institutional collapse as the endpoint of a decade-long MIT penetration: specifically, intelligence vetting of candidate slates in 2015 and pressure to sideline Syria-focused lawmakers in 2018. Every claim rests on his retrospective account of private conversations. Neither the CHP nor MIT has responded. The disclosure's timing, four days after Kılıçdaroğlu's court-ordered reinstatement amid street protests, and Aygün's own exclusion from the 2015 slate, point toward motivated political messaging rather than documented intelligence interference.

4 sources